Progression Pathways Assessment Framework KS1 (Y1) to KS3 (Y9)
    last edited Oct 10 2014 by Mark Dorling

    Created by Mark Dorling. Other contributors: Paul Browning

    Short description:

    The purpose of the Progression Pathways Assessment Framework is to support teachers in assessing their pupils’ progress in computing from Key Stage 1 (Year 1) through to Key Stage 3 (Year 9).

    Full description:

    NOTE:

    This resource has been superseded by: http://community.computingatschool.org.uk/resources/2324

    Description:

    The purpose of the Progression Pathways Assessment Framework is to support teachers in assessing their pupils’ progress in computing.

    The progression statements in the Assessment Framework have been created based on the 2014 National Curriculum for Computing points of study. It has also been aligned to the CAS Primary Guidance document.

    The column headings are aligned to the different strands of computing found in the Computing at Schools curriculum, which may be updated in the future, and if it is, it will provide guidance for teachers to help them accurately interpret the National Curriculum.

    The progression through each strand of computing is broken down in to rows. The rows are colour coded (like karate belts) to help the teacher to assess whether students are showing competence at different levels and recognise achievement or attainment.

    Schools can choose to assign arbitrary values (levels) to the coloured rows if they would like to use them with existing reporting systems.

    The focus of this assessment framework is progression through and across the strands of computing. If you plan to use this assessment framework with your existing assessment/reporting system then you can agree the benchmark ‘level’ for the pupils entering a particular key stage and assign the arbitrary benchmark value (level) to the appropriate progression statements for each strand.

    If your school uses a system to set targets for Computing based on performance in other subjects then the flexibility of the Progression Pathways grid allows you to adjust the values (levels) you choose to assign to the coloured rows.

    It is suggested that:
    - Primary teachers focus on the badge statements from the Pink to Purple row.
    - Secondary teachers focus on the badge statements from the Purple to Black row.
    - The white row overlaps with the KS4 qualification specifications.

    You may decide that pupils entering a particular year group or key stage have prior learning to suggest that they are on the yellow and orange rows for the various strands shown in the grid. If this is the case then you would start your teaching at the appropriate level and assign the arbitrary assessment/reporting values accordingly.

    There is a PDF document available for download that explains how the Progression Pathways Assessment Framework can used with Digital Badges.

    If you would like to provide feedback to this work, the authors would welcome your thoughts and specific suggestions for improvement. Please email them to: mark.dorling@computingatschool.org.uk

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA

    Available when logged in (join via the front page, for free):
    • View 140 comments on this resource.
    • View resource history, links to related resources.
    • Leave feedback for the author(s), or help by editing the resource.
    Screenshot_2014-01-21_15.42.27

    Files:
    doc Progression_Pathways_-_With_Digital_Badges.pdf
    Please enter in a description (downloads: 1666)

    doc Progression_Pathways_-_Without_Digital_Badges.pdf
    Please enter in a description (downloads: 934)

    doc Computing_Progression_Pathways_with_Computational_Thinking_V2.pdf
    Please enter in a description (downloads: 257)

    Download All
    Total downloads for all files (including previous versions): 9162

    Categories:

    Created by Computing At School is supported and endorsed by:

    Copyright University of Kent, 2009-2014. Contact admins. By using this site you agree to be bound by the community guidelines, licensing agreement, terms of service and related rules, including respecting copyright and other intellectual property rights of other users and the University of Kent.